ISO 11898-3 was released later and covers the CAN physical layer for low-speed, fault-tolerant CAN.
In 1993, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) released the CAN standard ISO 11898 which was later restructured into two parts ISO 11898-1 which covers the data link layer, and ISO 11898-2 which covers the CAN physical layer for high-speed CAN. These standards are freely available from Bosch along with other specifications and white papers. A CAN device that uses 11-bit identifiers is commonly called CAN 2.0A and a CAN device that uses 29-bit identifiers is commonly called CAN 2.0B. This specification has two parts part A is for the standard format with an 11-bit identifier, and part B is for the extended format with a 29-bit identifier. īosch published several versions of the CAN specification and the latest is CAN 2.0 published in 1991. Released in 1991, the Mercedes-Benz W140 was the first production vehicle to feature a CAN-based multiplex wiring system. The first CAN controller chips were introduced by Intel in 1987, and shortly thereafter by Philips. The protocol was officially released in 1986 at the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) conference in Detroit, Michigan. I did pick up VEP6 when it was on sale, though I haven’t played with it too much.Development of the CAN bus started in 1983 at Robert Bosch GmbH. My questions are, when running 6 or so instruments in Kontakt is it better to run 6 instances rather than load all instruments in one instance? If I then have Falcon/Mach 5 instruments as well is it the the same theory? I really got sucked in by Black Friday this year!! This last year I’ve been getting more VI and plugins. Not much of a problem for my 2010 MacPro 6 core. Then a number of guitar, bass, synths tracks recorded one at a time. I would load 5,6 banks into one instance of Mach 5, a couple instances of MX4.
#Audio overload mac 64 bit software
Mach 5, MX4 and MOTU plugs were the only software I had loaded. DP will assign each instance to a core so that's your limit on the number you have for balancing the instruments. Mikehalloran wrote:How many instances of Kontakt do you run? If multiple instruments, you should call up multiple instances to balance the load. For example, DP is using only 6,6 GB, and also the CPU charge is not too much (well 63% inactive CPU, but 272 %.) I was thinking to buy a new mac book pro, but looking the cpu and memory usage, I don't think that the problem is my laptop. I know that freezing I can solve the problem, but I don't like freeze instruments. too much drop, and sometimes also crash the system. in italian):Īt this point it's not possible work. Images from my OS X Activity Monitor (sorry.
#Audio overload mac 64 bit free
Obviously SSD hard disk with enough free space. MacBook Retina, late 2013, 16 gb Ram, 2,3 ghz Intel Core i7. 10 stereo bus (with CLA, One knobs, L2 etc) 26 mono tracks (with some CLA vocals, H-Delay, De-Esser etc.) 12 Virtual Instruments tracks (Kontakt, Trillian, Omisphere, Battery etc.) I tried a lot of tricks, but without solving my overload then drop problems. In the las months I'm working on heavy EDM projects, with several audio, virtual instruments and plugins. I read a lot of topics on the forum about this problem.